Study design
Randomized, patient-blinded, split-face pilot in 15 participants and 60 procedures. Vitaran I and Rejuran i were injected around opposite eyes with the same 34G needle and investigator.
2% PN focused on comfort and dewy-looking skin
Vitaran I and II contain sodium polynucleotide 20 mg/mL (2% PN), the same concentration as Rejuran Healer. Vitaran is positioned here for people who prioritize treatment comfort and a hydrated, dewy-looking skin goal. A physician confirms the variant, area and realistic outcome.

Quick answer
Vitaran I and II are documented at 20 mg/mL (2% PN). A small randomized split-face study found lower injection-pain scores with Vitaran I than Rejuran i around the eyes, while wrinkle outcomes were comparable. That evidence is specific to those variants and that area. Vitaran may be planned toward hydration and radiance, but no direct trial proves it creates more glow than Rejuran for everyone.
Official product information documents Vitaran I and Vitaran II at the same 20 mg/mL (2% PN) concentration, with syringe size and intended treatment area as the practical differences. This makes them concentration peers of Rejuran Healer, not a weaker PN category.
The differentiator is formulation and experience. In a randomized, patient-blinded split-face pilot, Vitaran I produced lower mean pain scores than Rejuran i during periorbital injection, with comparable wrinkle outcomes. Because the study included only 15 people and was funded by BR PHARM, it should not be generalized to Vitaran II, Rejuran Healer or full-face treatment without caution.
Identify the concern and treatment area before choosing a Vitaran variant.
Confirm the exact variant, concentration, injection depth and aftercare.
Review gradual skin-quality change and injection reactions before repeating treatment.
Randomized, patient-blinded, split-face pilot in 15 participants and 60 procedures. Vitaran I and Rejuran i were injected around opposite eyes with the same 34G needle and investigator.
Mean pain score was 3.39 for Vitaran I versus 5.01 for Rejuran i on a 10-point scale (p<0.0001). Vitaran I scored lower in 48 of 60 procedures.
The study was small, assessed the periorbital area, compared Vitaran I with Rejuran i, and was funded by BR PHARM. It does not prove the same difference for Vitaran II versus Rejuran Healer or for full-face treatment.
Evidence level: strong for the measured pain difference within this small randomized trial; emerging for generalizing that difference to other variants, areas and clinic techniques.
The physician first confirms the exact Vitaran variant, concentration and treatment area, then plans injection depth and spacing. Topical anaesthetic may be used. Session duration and number of visits depend on the area, technique, response and goal.
Small bumps, redness, swelling, tenderness or bruising may last from hours to a few days. Follow the clinic’s instructions on cleansing, skincare, make-up, exercise and symptoms that require medical review.
Evaluate change gradually with comparable photographs and follow-up rather than relying on temporary swelling after injection. Whether to repeat treatment depends on the named variant, response, side effects and original goal.
Everyone responds differently. Before treatment, your doctor will examine the area and talk through a plan that makes sense for you.
Official documentation lists Vitaran I and II at 20 mg/mL, equivalent to 2% PN. They use different syringe sizes and intended areas.
A small randomized split-face study found lower pain scores for Vitaran I than Rejuran i around the eyes. It does not establish the same difference for Vitaran II versus Rejuran Healer, full-face injection or every clinic technique.
Vitaran may be planned for hydration, tone and texture goals that patients describe as dewy-looking skin. There is no direct comparative trial proving it produces more glow than Rejuran for every person.
Small bumps, redness, swelling, tenderness or bruising may last from hours to a few days. Recovery varies by variant, area, technique and individual response.
Medical decision support
The pain comparison is a small manufacturer-funded study of Vitaran I versus Rejuran i around the eyes. Hydration and radiance are reasonable treatment goals, but no head-to-head evidence proves Vitaran produces more glow than Rejuran for every person.
This page provides general information and is not a diagnosis. A physician must review your medical history, skin or tissue condition, previous procedures and goals before recommending treatment.
Your treatment is performed by a doctor
Dr. Peerapol Riawraengsattha (Dr. Lhong)
Anesthesiology · Aesthetic Medicine · Thai medical licence 58253
Tell us what you are concerned about. Our team can help you prepare for a conversation with the doctor.
Before you decide
We last reviewed these sources on 23 July 2026. They can help you prepare for a consultation, but they cannot replace an examination or a consent discussion with your doctor.
Evidence for polynucleotide injections is promising but remains limited by small, heterogeneous studies. Product composition, concentration, indication and protocol should be verified.
Do not infer that evidence for the ingredient class proves identical results for every brand. Injection reactions and individual contraindications still require assessment.
Regulatory references describe their own jurisdictions and are used for safety context; they do not by themselves establish Thai registration or an indication for a specific product.
The final choice depends on an examination by a licensed doctor. Meet the doctors
Visit
246 Times Square Building, 4F, Room 411–412
Sukhumvit Rd, Khlong Toei, Bangkok 10110
Hours
Open 11:00–20:00
Open every day
Holistic Health & Beauty© 2026 Hori Clinic · Bangkok