Hori Clinic
ENไทย
Book Consultation

Comparison · RedTouch Pro

RedTouch Pro vs Pico Majesty: choose by the skin concern

These devices are not interchangeable in every case. First distinguish a structural or texture goal from a pigment goal, then have a physician diagnose the concern and assess skin-specific risk.

Medical review: Peerapol Riawraengsattha, M.D. · Thai medical licence 58253 · Updated 24 July 2026

RedTouch Pro 675 nm laser at Hori Clinic
Short answer: RedTouch Pro is a non-ablative 675 nm laser studied in relation to collagen remodelling and texture. Pico Majesty is a picosecond laser for which a physician selects wavelength and settings according to the diagnosed pigment or skin target. The device name alone is not a treatment plan.

Choose by what needs to be addressed

If the main concern is uneven texture, selected shallow acne scars, pores or some fine lines, a physician may consider RedTouch Pro after assessing scar type and depth. If the main target is freckles, dark marks or another pigment condition, an assessment for Pico Majesty or another approach may be more relevant.

Melasma requires particular caution because it is chronic and laser response depends on wavelength, fluence, delivery pattern, skin type and supporting care. Picosecond-laser findings for melasma vary between studies, so it is not a single answer for everyone.

A comparison without assigning the same job

Assessment goals for RedTouch Pro and Pico Majesty
TopicRedTouch ProPico Majesty
Primary page intentTexture and collagen remodellingPigment and selected picosecond-laser indications
Assessment neededScar type, depth and active inflammationPigment diagnosis, skin type and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation risk
LimitationDoes not release tethering or correct every deep scarDifferent wavelengths and settings do not produce equivalent effects

When more than one method may be needed

One person may have acne scars, dark marks and uneven tone together. Treating prioritised problems in stages may be safer and easier to measure than doing everything at once. Tethered scars may require assessment for subcision, while pigment should be diagnosed before energy is selected.

Questions to ask before deciding

  • Is the main finding a texture problem, tethering or a specific pigment condition?
  • Why is this device, wavelength and setting being selected?
  • What is my risk of persistent redness, burns or darker or lighter marks?
  • How will photographs and follow-up conditions be standardised?

Sources

  1. Tolone M, et al. Review of nonablative 675-nm laser technology. Dermatologic Clinics. 2024.
  2. Feng J, et al. Picosecond laser for melasma: systematic review and meta-analysis. 2023.

These sources inform the technologies in general. They do not validate every device setting or guarantee an individual result.

Peerapol Riawraengsattha, M.D.

Medically reviewed by

Peerapol Riawraengsattha, M.D.

Anesthesiology · Aesthetic medicine · Thai medical licence 58253

Start with the concern, not the machine

Tell the team whether texture, scarring or pigment is your main concern so a physician can assess the right direction.

Talk to @horiclinic